Have a Question? Talk to Us!



An Open Memorandum To The Igbo Diaspora Hoodwinked By The Global Rogue Biafra Franchise

Tony Nnadi, LNC-NINAS Joint Secretariat

15 January 2024

Going by the lamentations of the speaker in this Snow-Clearing video clip who identified himself as Emeugo in Montreal, Canada, about how “the zoo” chased him away from his beautiful Biafraland, it is obvious that Emeugo is one of the multitudes of the hoodwinked Igbo (particularly Diasporans), whose thoughts, sight and hearing are completely blocked by the scam, noise and propaganda of “Biafra Restoration”. (Link to the Lamentation Video Clip HERE: https://youtu.be/Mc4YScyv_YU?si=ljcy16RSeJQNvveq)

For reasons clearly stated in the article below titled: “Untangling the Greater Eastern Nigeria Liberation Campaign from the ‘Biafra Restoration’ Albatross”, it is self-evident that the Global Rogue Biafra Franchise is the worst debilitation to the Liberation Campaign being waged by the Victims of the Blood-Sucking and Man-Eating Monster called Nigeria under the aegis of the LNC-led Nigerian Indigenous Nationalities Alliance for Self-Determination (NINAS).

Anyone who knows or can reach the Emeugo in Montreal and those like him who are hoodwinked by the “Biafra Restoration” Scam, wherever they reside in Europe, America or Asia, should please forward to them the following LNC-NINAS Public Communication first Issued October 8, 2021:

Untangling The Greater Eastern Nigeria Liberation Campaign From The ‘Biafra Restoration’ Albatross.

Tony Nnadi, October 8, 2021.

During the Q&A session at a recent Virtual Town Hall, a zealous “Biafra Restoration” activist who also happened to be a University Teacher in the United States, was invited to explain to the audience, in precise terms, the exact meaning of the “Biafra Restoration” he had been campaigning about for some years.


  1. He was asked to explain to the audience the Exact Geographical Description of the Territory (ie Map) of the Biafra being restored.
  2. He was asked to name the Ethnic Nationalities included in the “Biafra” Territory covered by his Map.
  3. He was asked to describe the Goal of the Campaign in clear terms without using the phrase “Biafra Restoration”.

The fellow struggled for about five minutes, unable to provide concise answers for any of these three Specifics.

It dawned on him that despite being a University Teacher, he could not meaningfully describe the Campaign he was waging for years, in terms of Exact Territory, People(s) covered, and Goal because everything he tried to say brought out embarrassing gaps in the descriptions he was trying to advance.

By this little exercise, it dawned on him that he had all these years erroneously lumped these three items together in the word “Biafra” thereby creating an extraordinary kind of confusion.

Then we went on to unbundle the three items and so he immediately realized:

  1. That the use of the term “Biafra” in describing the Territory over which he seeks Independence, throws up the controversy as to whether it is the Biafra Territory of May 30, 1967 or whether the Territory has shrunk to the East Central State of May 27, 1967, or expanded to include parts or the whole of Midwest Region/State of May 27, 1967.

    It therefore dawned on him that a clear Territorial description of his prospective “Biafra” was necessary.

  2. That the use of the term “Biafrans” to describe the People seeking Independence also leaves everything in Controversy as to the actual People or Peoples (ie Ethnic Nationalities) seeking Independence via the “Biafra Restoration” Campaign.

    It dawned on him that “Biafrans” cannot be the clear description of the People(s) involved in the search for Independence in Eastern Nigeria since there is no settled Map for the current Biafra Restoration Campaign unlike the 1967 Biafra that was clearly defined, in terms of Territory, as the Eastern Region of May 1967.

  3. That the use of the word “Biafra” to describe the Goal of the Campaign instead of Self-Determination, for instance, also throws up the same controversies as in (i) and (ii) above.

When these three items were unbundled, it became clear to the fellow that the grave error of using “Biafra” to describe the Territory, the People, and the Goal was the biggest impediment to the Liberation Campaign they were trying to wage because it immediately surrounds the Liberation Campaign with such irresolvable controversies that operates like a huge albatross on the Liberation Campaign itself, and this is a most potent recipe for the failure of the entire Liberation Project, both for the Greater Eastern Nigeria and the entire NINAS Alliance Territories of the South and Middle-Belt.

Once we remove the word “Biafra” from the Campaign Nomenclature as outlined above, we immediately see much clearer, an easy-to-understand description of the Territory, the Peoples, and the FREEDOM Goal.

We can then build everything else on those three, devoid of Controversy.

This is precisely what the LNC did as can be gleaned from the ALADIMMA EPISTLE of 2012.

(Link to the ALADIMMA EPISTLE 2012 which outlines the nature of the War we are caught in and the Strategy that has been Deployed to Prevail HERE: https://ninasmovementnews.substack.com/p/aladinma?s=w)

Unfortunately, the bunch of clear-minded criminals who chose to monetize for themselves, the pains, suffering and ignorance of our traumatized People, set up and promoted by massive propaganda, the Global Rogue Biafra Franchise led by IPOB which pretends to be “Restoring Biafra” but which ruins the very fabrics of the NINAS-led Liberation Campaign that targets the very life of the Monster that occupies Igboland and other Territories conscripted by a combination of force and guile into the Toxic Nigerian Project.

Here is a 2020 video clip addressing the question of how the Rogue Biafra Franchise deliberately destroys the Liberation Campaign: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOkTO5d8lR8

Also, link to the Full text of the NINAS December 16, 2020 Constitutional Force Majeure as published by the Guardian Newspaper of January 20, 2021 (Pages 38, 39, 40 & 41) HERE: https://guardian.ng/features/notice-of-constitutional-grievances-declaration-of-constitutional-force-majeure-and-demand-for-transitioning-process-for-an-orderly-reconfiguration-of-the-constitutional-basis-of-the-federation/

With the Goal of Restoring the Sovereignty of various Peoples of Nigeria, Trapped in the Failed Lugardian Experiment of 1914, (including Igboland) the aforementioned NINAS Constitutional Force Majeure is the Mechanism by which the Liberation Movement led by NINAS is currently winding up the Defunct Federation of Nigeria (now operated as the Unitary State defined by the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria) to free up those Sovereignties into Fresh Protocols that could result in a Proper Federation, a Confederation or the emergence of Independent Units of Sovereign-Successor States in a process dictated by the Self-Determination imperative for the erstwhile Constituent Components of the Defunct Federation of Nigeria.

Here is an audiovisual Overview of the NINAS Union Reconfiguration Process framed by the Propositions of NINAS.


Those who genuinely seek an end to the Monstrous Suzerainty operated as Unitary Nigeria which currently occupies their Homelands, must now depart from confusion and obfuscation to embrace the clear, safe pathway to redemption, offered all by the NINAS Grand Strategy.

Tony Nnadi
LNC-NINAS Joint Secretariat
October 8, 2021

(This LNC-NINAS Publication is being reissued January 15, 2024 in support of the Open Memorandum to the Igbo Diaspora Community hoodwinked by the Rogue “Biafra Restoration” Franchise”.)

This entry was posted in News & Events. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *